This entry was posted
on Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010 at 6:28 pm and is filed under Sarah Palin Videos.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
25 Responses to “Ailes defends Sarah Palin and also notes “We’re winning””
@mstraney cont.d
socialism:
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
@mstraney “Wow the USSR wanted to become what didn’t exist, huh. Wow you should listen to yourself. your a retard.”
??? You cant even understand the simple? Yes they wanted, lets repeat for slow people like you who came from incest, they wanted but never accomplished the goal of becoming communist. Is this easy enough, or is your zombie socialist brain too damaged to comprehend the simple?
@mstraney goods are owned in common and are available to all as needed Are you even reading ??????? That what you are writing??? And when did USSR EVER had that? Exactly what I said you have confirmed, and still you think somehow what I said was wring? WOW, stupidity really flows out of you, I told you quit while you are ahead. The socialism as you described is EXACTLY what USSR had
@samuils Do you speak english. You seem very confused. A rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock.
Before Adam Smith wrote of the invisible hand, were free-markets still capitalist? Of fucking course they were schmuck.
you are the one who is hung up on anachronism. Words can be used to describe things from the past. Watch you were an idiot a year ago , you still are, but you were then too.
@mstraney So how do you manage to describe A government program as socialist, while the very same programs have existed in every government even before socialism came to be? Mind telling me how not idiotic you are, and how your English comprehension is great?
@mstraney Well you dont get to define English either, considering that once again that ALL governments have had these basic programs, then they are nothing BUT government programs and are not owned by any specific type of governance, and I really dont care how much you hate it that we dont accept socialism, you dont get to define it the way you see fit
@mstraney I wasnt talking about the word “capitalist” if you can read you will understand, I said Capitalist government, too hard to understand eh? you are a fuckwit
“how do you manage to describe A government program as socialist, while the very same programs have existed in every government even before socialism came to be?”
how do you manage to describe any program as capitalist, while the very same programs have existed in every place even before capitalism came to be?
@mstraney Well the logic has escaped you, but YOU might want to try it indeed, Considering that once again Capitalist government came to be way before socialist government, you cant describe duties of the government as socialist considering that capitalist government has had these very services BEFORE socialists, should I say it again? Capitalists had it before socialist, maybe repetition will work on you.
Socialism:1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
Public education is distributed by the government as a public service, and this is done via our political system
@mstraney Capitalist “like” governments have existed in the ancient worlds, now you are getting hung up on the words. “Capitalist like governments” <-read this slowly and try to grasp the concept. Meaning they were not named that but governed in an extremely similar fusion. So yes capitalist systems predate socialist.And Btw I dont run around naming military courts and other systems as capitalist, but you sure want to name them socialist.I just call them government duties.I love u too
if it looks like a duck and talks like a duck it’s a duck.
“Capitalist like governments”? Citation/definition from a dicitionary please
Look here is your argument against you:
“Socialist “like” governments have existed in the ancient worlds, now you are getting hung up on the words. “Socialist like governments” <-read this slowly and try to grasp the concept. Meaning they were not named that but governed in an extremely similar fusion
@samuils BTW capitalism is better at allocating resources fairly effectively and efficiently almost all of the time.
However, it doesn’t make sense to let other houses burn, while only fighting the fire at the customer’s house. Their house will just catch on fire again when it jumps back from their next-door neighbor.
Likewise, it doesn’t make sense to have an uneducated populous, because it will result in a low quality work force. it’s hard to start a company with only uneducated workers.
omg are you f-ing stupid? these moderate republicans are finding ground To find compramise… i’ll let you in on a secerate most americans are not conservative!!! conservatives are trying to tear this country arpart to further thier need to be close minded….
Whatever. Perhaps you should stop by real clear politics where they show you that 61% of the country falls into the conservative/republican area, whereas 31% call themselves ‘democrats. Whos fooling who?
With just one year the democrats suck so much that the country is wishing for W back-thats pathetic!
You are the party that can fuckup a wet dream.
thats funny that site on average has a polling of only about 1,500 peole per queston…. you people are to stupid to understand that your party is so divided you might not win anything in 2010!!!!! go ahead kick out the moderates see how that works out for you…. we’re the party that can fuck up a wet dream? who’s the party who put sarah palin up for vice president? ok now shut the fuck up and go back to your bombshelter we’ll call you when we need you!!!!
Let them lose! Get the softspoken pussies out of there!
Let them be democrat-lite with the democrats.
We need more conservative people that wont back down on principle. Ever hear of it? You dont budge on your principles, you budge on ways to work towards your goal. Let Obama have his way. The people want real conservative values, not more gub’ment run bullshit by pussy leftists that seek to destroy the country, not help it!
so what you are saying a small number of “consevatives” think they are what this country wants? it is very bold of you to say that… have you ever heard of compramise? probably not!!! that is the only way things get done!!!! what are you taking about? you people are the ones who think this country is yours alone and want to divide the american public to poloarize this country against itself!!! don’t worry you’ll find out how irrelevant you are in 2010!!!
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:30 am
@mstraney cont.d
socialism:
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:35 am
@samuils
You don’t get to define the English language according to what you like sorry!
Government run public education and firefighters are a government distributed service. And the political theories of the United States advocate that.
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:35 am
@mstraney “Wow the USSR wanted to become what didn’t exist, huh. Wow you should listen to yourself. your a retard.”
??? You cant even understand the simple? Yes they wanted, lets repeat for slow people like you who came from incest, they wanted but never accomplished the goal of becoming communist. Is this easy enough, or is your zombie socialist brain too damaged to comprehend the simple?
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:37 am
@mstraney goods are owned in common and are available to all as needed Are you even reading ??????? That what you are writing??? And when did USSR EVER had that? Exactly what I said you have confirmed, and still you think somehow what I said was wring? WOW, stupidity really flows out of you, I told you quit while you are ahead. The socialism as you described is EXACTLY what USSR had
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:42 am
@samuils Do you speak english. You seem very confused. A rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock is a rock.
Before Adam Smith wrote of the invisible hand, were free-markets still capitalist? Of fucking course they were schmuck.
you are the one who is hung up on anachronism. Words can be used to describe things from the past. Watch you were an idiot a year ago , you still are, but you were then too.
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:43 am
@samuils There are 3 different definitions you dumpster baby giveaway
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:45 am
@samuils
You don’t get to define the English language according to what you like sorry!
Government run public education and firefighters are a government distributed service. And the political theories of the United States advocate that.
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:46 am
@mstraney So how do you manage to describe A government program as socialist, while the very same programs have existed in every government even before socialism came to be? Mind telling me how not idiotic you are, and how your English comprehension is great?
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:48 am
Yes new words and ideas can be applied to things that existed before those words cames about!
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:52 am
@mstraney Well you dont get to define English either, considering that once again that ALL governments have had these basic programs, then they are nothing BUT government programs and are not owned by any specific type of governance, and I really dont care how much you hate it that we dont accept socialism, you dont get to define it the way you see fit
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:54 am
The first use of the word “capitalism” in English is by novelist Thackeray in 1854
so there was no capitalism before 1854?
you are a fuckwit
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:58 am
@mstraney I wasnt talking about the word “capitalist” if you can read you will understand, I said Capitalist government, too hard to understand eh? you are a fuckwit
February 3rd, 2010 at 6:04 am
“how do you manage to describe A government program as socialist, while the very same programs have existed in every government even before socialism came to be?”
how do you manage to describe any program as capitalist, while the very same programs have existed in every place even before capitalism came to be?
It’s called logic try it some time.
February 3rd, 2010 at 6:09 am
@mstraney Well the logic has escaped you, but YOU might want to try it indeed, Considering that once again Capitalist government came to be way before socialist government, you cant describe duties of the government as socialist considering that capitalist government has had these very services BEFORE socialists, should I say it again? Capitalists had it before socialist, maybe repetition will work on you.
February 3rd, 2010 at 6:10 am
Merriam webster(that’s a dictionary)
Socialism:1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
Public education is distributed by the government as a public service, and this is done via our political system
that is the definition of socialism
February 3rd, 2010 at 6:15 am
Oh my dear lord you are quite probably the stupidest person I have ever had the displeasure of trying to talk with.
The theory of capitalism didn’t exist before adam smith but capitalism did
The theory of Socialism didn’t exist befor Karl Marx but socialism did
you suck!
February 3rd, 2010 at 6:28 am
@mstraney Capitalist “like” governments have existed in the ancient worlds, now you are getting hung up on the words. “Capitalist like governments” <-read this slowly and try to grasp the concept. Meaning they were not named that but governed in an extremely similar fusion. So yes capitalist systems predate socialist.And Btw I dont run around naming military courts and other systems as capitalist, but you sure want to name them socialist.I just call them government duties.I love u too
February 3rd, 2010 at 6:50 am
A rose by any other name.
if it looks like a duck and talks like a duck it’s a duck.
“Capitalist like governments”? Citation/definition from a dicitionary please
Look here is your argument against you:
“Socialist “like” governments have existed in the ancient worlds, now you are getting hung up on the words. “Socialist like governments” <-read this slowly and try to grasp the concept. Meaning they were not named that but governed in an extremely similar fusion
February 3rd, 2010 at 7:12 am
@samuils BTW capitalism is better at allocating resources fairly effectively and efficiently almost all of the time.
However, it doesn’t make sense to let other houses burn, while only fighting the fire at the customer’s house. Their house will just catch on fire again when it jumps back from their next-door neighbor.
Likewise, it doesn’t make sense to have an uneducated populous, because it will result in a low quality work force. it’s hard to start a company with only uneducated workers.
February 3rd, 2010 at 4:20 pm
omg are you f-ing stupid? these moderate republicans are finding ground To find compramise… i’ll let you in on a secerate most americans are not conservative!!! conservatives are trying to tear this country arpart to further thier need to be close minded….
February 3rd, 2010 at 4:22 pm
also your polarizaton of the party is going to lose all the seatsfor conservatives and moderates alike… way to go douche bags… way to be retarded!!!!
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:23 pm
Whatever. Perhaps you should stop by real clear politics where they show you that 61% of the country falls into the conservative/republican area, whereas 31% call themselves ‘democrats. Whos fooling who?
With just one year the democrats suck so much that the country is wishing for W back-thats pathetic!
You are the party that can fuckup a wet dream.
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:42 pm
thats funny that site on average has a polling of only about 1,500 peole per queston…. you people are to stupid to understand that your party is so divided you might not win anything in 2010!!!!! go ahead kick out the moderates see how that works out for you…. we’re the party that can fuck up a wet dream? who’s the party who put sarah palin up for vice president? ok now shut the fuck up and go back to your bombshelter we’ll call you when we need you!!!!
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:46 pm
Let them lose! Get the softspoken pussies out of there!
Let them be democrat-lite with the democrats.
We need more conservative people that wont back down on principle. Ever hear of it? You dont budge on your principles, you budge on ways to work towards your goal. Let Obama have his way. The people want real conservative values, not more gub’ment run bullshit by pussy leftists that seek to destroy the country, not help it!
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:59 pm
so what you are saying a small number of “consevatives” think they are what this country wants? it is very bold of you to say that… have you ever heard of compramise? probably not!!! that is the only way things get done!!!! what are you taking about? you people are the ones who think this country is yours alone and want to divide the american public to poloarize this country against itself!!! don’t worry you’ll find out how irrelevant you are in 2010!!!